Where does morality come from? Where does the human sense of right and wrong originate from? Has it been implanted in our brains through millenniums of evolution that those who do things that are considered to be right succeed more than those who are immoral? Is morality a learned trait; does our environment (parents, family, and friends) teach us everything that we know about morality? Is it a synthesis of learned and instinct? Or does morality lead us to the belief of the existence of a supernatural creator? (you can tell which way I lean)
I believe that there are very few, if any explanations which satisfy the quirks of human morality quite as well as a supernatural creator. “Morality” is not exactly the same in every culture, but it appears to me that rather than being taught or learned morality can be forgotten or to use improper English, unlearned. People can be told, nay trained, that what they naturally believe and feel, is wrong. A child may be confounded as to why an honor killing of their sibling was justified, but the adults have disregarded their notion that murder is wrong in exchange for the belief that their reputation is more important than any life. I believe that we all have an inane spark from God that leaves even those who do not believe in Yahweh with grace. This grace not only to allows sinners to do what is wrong, grace allows the sinner to know what they are doing is wrong.
Cultures have built societies around unlearned morals, most of India believes that lies are not wrong because they protect reputation. Some of the Indian ruling class have been told and told themselves so many lies, that they believe that the caste system actually is good for the poor. This is just one example of how degraded morals lead to a broken society. However, the new generations are rising up, because they know that what is being done to them is not right. Which brings us to the fundamental question (behind the question) what is right and wrong and how is it defined. Those who are religious have a very easy pathway to answer this question, they can say what is right in God’s eyes is right and what is wrong in God’s eyes is wrong.
Yet there are many who do not believe in any religion and in fact believe that all religions are parasites (oh, hi there Sam Harris and Peter Joseph). Those who wish to take God totally out of the equation must define morality as, the scientific state of well being. This definition of morality has been tried and tested, and it has failed. Nicolae Ceauşescu attempted to furnish a state of scientific well-being in his country through fertility, equality, and atheism; however anyone who looked at his orphanages could say that they were not “moral”. To see the consequences of removing God from the equation we must simply look at the communist experiment. These countries attempted to become the perfect society, free of God, want, need or inequality, but I don’t have to say much as to how they turned out. They all tried to take God out of the morality equation, and their societies collapsed because they were dependent on having a moral country. I find it intriguing that over time Communism began to look more and more like a religion itself. They believed that they could replace God and religion, but as time wore on they began saying pledges, singing songs of praise, dancing, and holding a singular book to be “holy”. Which brings me to my point; any movement that tries to promote a certain moral agenda, will soon look like a religion.
I believe that morality points back to the creator. The communists wanted to praise the ones who were leading them and giving them morals because it has been installed in our human nature that the one who gives us our morals is greater than us and worthy of pledges and praise. Yes, both nature and nurture do provide us a sense of extended cultural morality, but at its very core it seems that the one who instills morals is worthy of praise.